case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-08-22 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #3519 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3519 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #503.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-08-23 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
Disagreed. Finding a deep enough emotional or romantic attraction to one member of the same or opposite gender despite their gender and having the gender be a stumbling block is not how I would define bisexual. It also doesn't mean you're open to any further relationships with someone of that gender, because you're still not attracted to that gender as a group and never were.

Signaling availability is part of sexuality, and if you're 100% straight or gay besides this one exception and 100% not available to anyone else of that gender, you're not bi in any sense I would agree with.