Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-08-22 06:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #3519 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3519 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #503.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Is there also a double-standard? (Not OP)
(Anonymous) 2016-08-23 01:30 am (UTC)(link)But I think it's also interesting to note that het ships (and to a lesser extent femmslash) are far more often accused of being "problematic" or "abusive" than slash ships--even when they are comparable.
Some examples that come to mind are: Doctor/Female-Companion-of-Choice (co-dependent), CaptainSwan ("abusive" b/c he used to be a villain)
Compare...
BBC!Sherlock/Moriarity (stalkery, abusive, co-dependant), Blaine/Kurt (co-dependant, possessive)
This is even true to a lesser extent with femmslash ships (even though femmslash is rare in fanon and even rarer in canon ). OUAT's SwanQueen ( abusive b/c Regina was a villain) and Rose/Luisa from JTV (co-dependant/ abusive ) have much more ugly discourse surrounding them than Valjean/Javert (co-dependant/ potential to be abusive/enemies) or Merthur (co-dependant/unequal)
A particularly interesting example is Doctor/Master. 10/Master is just as "problematic" as 12/Missy and just as interesting narratively. Yet somehow when the Master re-generated into a woman, all of sudden there was some "12/Missy is abusive and gross" drama.
^And before I get accused of being an apologist, it's important to note that I don't ship any of these pairings. I just find it scary that we can't even seem to have ship- conversations without being tarred and feather as "apologists" and that so much of it seems focused around ships with female characters.
Re: Is there also a double-standard? (Not OP)
Re: Is there also a double-standard? (Not OP)
(Anonymous) 2016-08-23 02:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: Is there also a double-standard? (Not OP)
(Anonymous) 2016-08-23 03:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: Is there also a double-standard? (Not OP)
(Anonymous) 2016-08-23 03:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: Is there also a double-standard? (Not OP)
(Anonymous) 2016-08-23 04:05 am (UTC)(link)The last time there was a Doctor/Master pairing was 10/Simm!Master, in the very beginning of 2010. While there were people who were pointing out that it was abusive, most Doctor/Master shippers were going "yeah, that's what makes it interesting" and writing our fucked-up porn.
Now, sadly, the fandom culture has shifted to where pointing out "problematic" ships is a mainstream activity.
Re: Is there also a double-standard? (Not OP)
Re: Is there also a double-standard? (Not OP)
(Anonymous) 2016-08-23 04:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: Is there also a double-standard? (Not OP)
(Anonymous) 2016-08-23 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)