case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-08-27 04:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #3524 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3524 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #504.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Where are you on the socio sexual hierarchy

(Anonymous) 2016-08-27 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I tried, honestly, but I can't understand the categories in the thing OP linked to because the blog post one is all referential. Did they mean the original chart that the blog post is referencing?

Re: Where are you on the socio sexual hierarchy

(Anonymous) 2016-08-27 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I dunno. The link OP posted made sense to me (and amused me).
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: Where are you on the socio sexual hierarchy

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2016-08-27 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it made sense to me. It is just a goofy thing to sort yourself into!

Re: Where are you on the socio sexual hierarchy

(Anonymous) 2016-08-27 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Alpha Beta Delta made sense to me, then Gamma was straight up "wut", their measures for Sigma aren't defined anywhere, and Lambdas are men who prefer men but are 5-10% are ok with women for romance which means bisexuals are unicorns?
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Where are you on the socio sexual hierarchy

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-08-28 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
Bisexuals don't exist in the fucked-up world of Vox Day.

Re: Where are you on the socio sexual hierarchy

(Anonymous) 2016-08-27 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
There's this odd focus on "weird" without defining what weird means. "Weird 25% of the time"? "Weird 5-10% of the time?" According to who and by what measure? What the heck is a Gamma or a "male-identified wom[a]n"?Gammas like manly women but Sigma-Gammas are PUA???

I would like to play but this is not a well thought out system. :(

Re: Where are you on the socio sexual hierarchy

(Anonymous) 2016-08-28 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
da

yea I was having trouble figuring out what a male-identifying woman is as well... do they mean a tomboy? a cross-dresser? MtF?

and idg the percentage system either... is an alpha 100% non-weird? what if they're alpha-gamma? how much do I reduce from 100% ???
how do u math, mysterious blog person