[ SECRET POST #3531 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3531 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 47 secrets from Secret Submission Post #505.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Seemingly progressive things that actually sound skeevy

[(Anonymous)]

I've found that's usually the case, tbh. Whenever anyone is "side-eyeing" or finds something "skeevy" or like OP said "rubs them the wrong way" it's usually something they find morally repugnant, or if used in a lighter context, morally dubious, about it.

I have never heard anyone describe a spider as "skeevy" for example, even if they think spiders are scary or disgusting. Moral judgment is always somehow linked

Re: Seemingly progressive things that actually sound skeevy

[(Anonymous)]

So how will I know if they mean "morally repugnant" or "morally dubious"? Which did OP mean?

Re: Seemingly progressive things that actually sound skeevy

[(Anonymous)]

OP: In my story's case, the latter.
(Why are you so set on this though?)

Re: Seemingly progressive things that actually sound skeevy

[(Anonymous)]

Well, considering op said "sounds" skeevy and not "is" skeevy, you can assume dubious. I assumed dubious because of that.

Context clues. :)