[ SECRET POST #3537 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3537 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Art by: http://slashpalooza.tumblr.com/post/149564769513/thank-you-for-all-the-comments-havent-had-time]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Stephen King, BTK murderer and The Good Marriage]


__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for pedophilia, incest]

(Rick and Morty)


__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for rl death]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #505.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

He didn't write about them, dude. He created fictional characters that had nothing to do with real people other than using the idea of someone unknowingly living with a serial killer as inspiration.

[luxshine]

This. Is like hating Hitchcock or Bloch for Psycho, which was pretty much based on rummors about Ed Guin even before Ed Guin was sentenced formally.

the book is not about the BTK family. You can read the book and have no idea about BTK and how the case went, and it is still the same, powerful story.

(Not to mention, it's not the only story vaguely inspired by BTK, nor the only not to ask "permission")

Also, the woman is pretty much a big damn hero in the book, so I don't see how that is "disrespectful".