[ SECRET POST #3541 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3541 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #506.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: some food for thought

[philstar22]

There are no cases of trans women attacking cis women in bathrooms. Not a single one.

Re: some food for thought

[sparrow_lately]

+100

Re: some food for thought

[(Anonymous)]

Are you aware that the actress in your icon is being demonized by transactivists for being a "TERF" because she once said in an interview that she's not interested in penises?

Re: some food for thought

[(Anonymous)]

Are you aware there are radicals on both sides that shouldn't be listened to? You seem to have trouble telling them apart.

Re: some food for thought

[sparrow_lately]

(:
(:

Re: some food for thought

[(Anonymous)]

god bless you

Re: some food for thought

[(Anonymous)]

lol as if every response to this thread isn't a classic example of derailing

Re: some food for thought

[(Anonymous)]

Link

Re: some food for thought

[(Anonymous)]

http://dontreblogbigots.tumblr.com/post/149972704289/ughura-tag-your-gotdamn-transphobes

Re: some food for thought

[(Anonymous)]

This is a very easily disproved lie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzwMJAFWLtQ

I can provide more examples, if you like. The ones cited in that video are just the tip of the iceberg.

Re: some food for thought

[philstar22]

Those are not trans women. Those are cis men who would have done the same thing regardless of laws. The laws cover trans women only, not cis men.

Re: some food for thought

[(Anonymous)]

Uh-huh. Sure.

Ever heard of the No True Scotsman fallacy?

Re: some food for thought

[philstar22]

Nope. The men in this video are clearly cis men. And the fact that you either don't think so or are pretending not to believe that says you are either a troll or a transphobic person with really offensive views who isn't likely to listen to reason, so I'm done.

Re: some food for thought

[dethtoll]

Silence, meat robot.

Re: some food for thought

[(Anonymous)]

Typical male.

Re: some food for thought

[dethtoll]

Typical TERF.