[ SECRET POST #3542 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3542 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #506.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[ketita]

What anon above me said. I don't think it has to do with CGI or even plot convolutions, but with types of information that are transmitted in prose and in film completely differently.
I'm not saying it's impossible to make things work, but I think the amount of skill and artistry you'd need is above average, in order to really capture the essence of the book.

And you know what, even with streamlining plot - not every streamlined plot will make as good a movie as it did a book. The structure of the two is quite different.
Even among successful movie adaptations of books, the adaptations that are *as good* as the book stand out because of how rare they are.