case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-14 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #3542 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3542 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #506.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-09-16 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Amazingly, "my son" (don't have any kids yet, but probably will in future) won't be my property. Sorry, kids don't belong to their parents and humans have the right to bodily autonomy, full stop.

Assuming you're not trolling, because the way you worded your comment kinda makes it sound like you are.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)
So I'm assuming your hypothetical son would also be sitting in a fermenting pile of his own feces until he was old enough to grant you informed consent to touch his ass? You know, in the interest of granting full bodily autonomy to infants.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-09-17 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't be absurd. Wiping a baby's butt of poop has zero effect on them as adults. Cutting off part of their body does.

Would you be ok with someone cutting off some of their infant's fingers for religious reasons?