case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-19 07:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #3547 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3547 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #507.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

OP

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Brandiweed is correct.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
I adore what HPL made, even though the cost of it, his othering of people, is atrocious. That's why it's important to me to look at the people that came after, that were inspired by what he made and made new iterations that don't have the shittiest of foundations - like GDT and even King.

Lovecraft IS hugely imperfect, but he's also incredibly influential. I think both is okay here.

OP

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
For me, it's the monsters. I love, love, love Cthulhu and friends.

(And I really do appreciate GDT and King and others who use the aesthetic without the icky stuff - it makes me feel a little less shitty for liking it, too, and I try very hard to avoid icky stuff in my own Mythos/Mythos-influenced fiction.)