Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-09-19 07:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #3547 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3547 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #507.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 12:45 am (UTC)(link)There were occasional aspects that I liked, especially the detail they put into recreating the Nordic outpost, and the nods to the original, but I wanted so much more from it.
I especially wish they'd stuck with doing the effects practically. iirc, they intended them to be practical and filmed them that way, but they got overlaid by digital in post-production.
And I completely agree about the dog (mentioned in a previous comment). Why couldn't they have at least gotten a dog that looked right?!
OP
(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 12:51 am (UTC)(link)That is my understanding about the effects - while IMO there still would have been a lot of problems with the film story and character-wise, the practical effects I saw looked great, definitely better than the CGI effects they did went with.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 12:56 am (UTC)(link)Yes, exactly. I agree with this 100%. I might have even forgiven some of the plot and character issues (some... not a lot) if they'd gone with practical effects. It would've felt so much more 'true' to the franchise.