case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-19 07:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #3547 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3547 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #507.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
Just admit the Congo was safer and generally more productive when Europeans were running it instead of native warlords.
kallanda_lee: (Default)

[personal profile] kallanda_lee 2016-09-20 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
You mean when ole Leopold was using it as hit private Zoo and chopping off heads and hands? Ah yes, the good ole days. /s

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Yet a European woman could visit it and have little fear for her safety, unlike now. You don't have to think it was good, just better than it is now. Which is pretty much native warlords running it in the same way as Leopold only without the building of institutions, transport links, and public safety.
kallanda_lee: (Default)

[personal profile] kallanda_lee 2016-09-20 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
The warlords are in large part a result of Europe totally messing up existing power dynamics and societal structures

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
Only in that Europe developed guns for them to use. Other than that it is a return to the status quo of Africa with native genocides re-occurring as they did pre-intervention era.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
No. Wrong. Do not pass go.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
this is like, next level trolling.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
Not really. Pretty well-developed vein of revisionist history.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 04:55 am (UTC)(link)
imo the over the top language like bringing up the safety of white women and "native warlords" takes it beyond that, ymmv

(Anonymous) 2016-09-20 07:00 pm (UTC)(link)
No, because that is factually untrue. Please go and study something called "history" as you seem to be unfamiliar with it.