[ SECRET POST #3547 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3547 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #507.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But it doesn't really fit the argument we were having. Because what I thought we were trying to discuss was the idea that problematicness leads to entertaining - that if things weren't problematic, they were boring. But this doesn't show that there's a link between problematicness and entertainment - just that if you set a sufficiently high bar for problematicness, nothing can pass over it.

I'm honestly really, really much more interested in the idea that being problematic is necessary to be entertaining, not that being problematic is inevitable.