[ SECRET POST #3553 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3553 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #508.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

"abuse supporters"

I hate Klancers so much. Enjoying "abusive" relationships in media =/= supporting abuse.

[(Anonymous)]

Guess I'm a murder supporter (CSI, CM, lots of video games, etc.) and a drug abuse supporter (House) beastiality supporter (Zootopia, Disney's Robin Hood) animal abuse supporter (HTTYD) and cannibalism supporter (Hannibal) I'm sure I can think of a few more horrible things I support. Oh! Genocide supporter too (GotG)

[(Anonymous)]

Seriously, this. Writing about dark topics/relationships in iction =/= supporting and endorsing them in reality. Some people do have a hard time telling the difference, yes, but for the most part, most fanfic writers just want to write a freaking story and leave it at that.

[(Anonymous)]

I mostly agree with your sentiment, but that's... not what bestiality means.

[(Anonymous)]

You don't know. Maybe they're trying to create their own anthropomorphic foxes from scratch.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT I figure if half the stuff fandom considers abuse nowadays counts, the idea of fictional animals being able to talk and consent when RL animals can't probably counts as Problematic too.

[(Anonymous)]

There's no "probably" about it.
I ship a human with an anthro animal (portrayed as able to communicate and consent and hold down a job and such), and I've seen people call the ship (this specific ship) "problematic" and "beastiality" because the animal's not a human.

...Not quite the same as the works you mentioned (human/animal rather than animal/animal), but it's similar I think.

[(Anonymous)]

every single person on fandom secrets thinks this

isn't there some point where we can stop needing to grind this particular ax

[(Anonymous)]

Yep, the point is when people will stop harassing others on perceived "abusive ships" that aren't abusive.

[(Anonymous)]

"Abuse supporter" is not at all a Klancer phrase. I'm not in that fandom and people in my fandoms call each other abuse supporters constantly.

[dahli]

Not in the fandom but isn't this a thing in in general fandoms, though? Enjoying something that might be perceived as "not healthy" wll get constant call-out posts from people who will make huge posts (and huge deals) on how to correctly ship something.

Klance(?) fandom is just the newest one where people do this.