case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-09-26 06:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #3554 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3554 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #508.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-09-27 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess I'm just annoyed at the entire trend of cock worship. Maybe that is unfair :/ people like what they like. But it annoys me that people want feminization without actually including women, and it annoys me that submission and femininity are constantly equated.

I don't really care what people write or read or fap to, but the terminology OP alluded to annoys me for those reasons.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-27 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Idk, I think it makes sense. Feminine =/= women. Saying that m/m with a feminine man might as well have a woman doesn't make any sense to me, because there's no dearth of m/f out there; anyone who wants similar m/f content can easily find it, so it's not like people are "settling" for some off-brand version of women.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-28 08:17 am (UTC)(link)
+1
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-09-28 01:10 pm (UTC)(link)
True, but why then use female anatomy terms?