[ SECRET POST #3557 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3557 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #508.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Fashion Trends you Don't Get

[(Anonymous)]

I can see the point that you're making here, and apparently that's what OP meant, but I hope you can see why I read it the way that I did.

Re: Fashion Trends you Don't Get

[(Anonymous)]

Not really. OP made a clear distinction between proper overalls worn by people in trade for practical reasons vs. "cute" ones that aren't mean to be practical items of clothing. Not at all classist, in other words. Seems to me you were looking for a reason to be offended, though I can't imagine why.

Re: Fashion Trends you Don't Get

[(Anonymous)]

NA

+1

Re: Fashion Trends you Don't Get

[diet_poison]

I could see it if OP had spoken disparagingly at all of trade jobs or even implicitly looked down on them, but they really didn't. Can you explain why you read it that way?

Re: Fashion Trends you Don't Get

[(Anonymous)]

I didn't read it as being about practical versus impractical. I read "cute" not as focusing on the impracticality, but as being about... people who are trying to be fashionable and look cute, I guess? So the way that I read it was that OP thought it was weird that people who were trying to be fashionable were wearing things that "only belong on farmers/plumbers/etc". That there was somehow a gap where, like, those things should never be considered fashionable precisely because they "only belong" on tradespeople - not because they're practical for tradespeople, but because there's some sort of class-based appropriateness. Yeah.

TBH, really, a lot of the reason that I interpreted it that way comes down to that specific phrase - "they only belong on". Makes it sound like some kind of natural law.

Re: Fashion Trends you Don't Get

[diet_poison]

I see where you're coming from now, but I think you're being really pedantic with that phrase and assigning it a lot of intent that I didn't read into it at all.

Re: Fashion Trends you Don't Get

[(Anonymous)]

Well, like I said, my interpretation was clearly wrong. But that was my reaction.