[ SECRET POST #3563 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3563 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Notorious]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #509.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: ^ This is literally cultish behaviour.

[(Anonymous)]

If you really think that there is no such thing as clear, definable biological sex, then I see no point discussing this with you any further, because any argument you make is going to be grounded in incorrect ideas about how human biology works.

I've said this already downthread, but: Humans are a sexually dymorphic species. The existence of intersex conditions does not disprove that, any more than the existence of people born with no legs would disprove that humans are a bipedal species.

Re: ^ This is literally cultish behaviour.

[(Anonymous)]

I think it's fair to say that sex is broadly dymorphic and that there's such a thing as biological sex. I think it remains accurate to say that sex is a complex category, and that gender, and especially the relationship between and among relationship and gender, are complex things

Also this is the point where my drunk-assedness is going to progressively start to make my arguments make less sense so please forgive me for that in advance