case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-10-09 03:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #3567 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3567 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 72 secrets from Secret Submission Post #510.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-09 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
The fact that Hillary is also irredeemable.

I thank God I do not live in a swing state and can write my candidate in without handing electoral votes to her.

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-09 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Genuine question: when you say this, do you think it's true in a moral sense (Hillary is equally morally irredeemable as Trump) or in a pragmatic sense (Hillary would make an equally bad president as Trump)? Or both? Or neither, and I've just fundamentally missed something here?

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-09 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Hillary would be a terrible President, while I honestly do not know what kind of President Trump would be. In this case, the "devil I know" is most definitely not "better."

As far as her being "irredeemable" from a moral/religious sense, I think anyone can turn their life around if they choose to. But, at this point, I think she's a genuinely awful person, if not outright evil, for a variety of reasons. I find Trump marginally less awful.

And fuck both parties for giving us a "choice" like this. The Vice Presidential candidates on both sides would be far superior to the shit sandwich we're saddled with--right now it's a choice between two crack whores, and it's just that one will give us AIDS in addition to herpes.

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-09 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, thank you for clarifying
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-10-10 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)
NAYRT but that's really not an actual answer. Nothing in this explains why you think she's evil, worse than trump, etc.

(And seriously? Pence? Far superior? man, what)

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
Good for you for relying on everyone else to do the actual work in the election so you can stay on the moral high horse.

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, fuck you and get off your own high horse. I live in the reddest of red states. I think my state actually went 70% for Romney in the last election. I would not be surprised if Hillary finished third here. My vote will not make one whit of difference, and if it did, I would hold my breath and vote for Trump because Hillary is not to be borne.

As it sits, I'm still voting in a Senate, House, Gubernatorial, and local State houses election. I'm hardly sitting it out.

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
You'd sooner vote the candidate that would see abortion and gay marriage outlawed, affordable healthcare repealed, and has voiced his willingness to nuke absolutely anywhere.

ok

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
Considering the fact that abortion and gay marriage are a done deal and will never be taken back no matter what (so that's a straw bugbear), Obamacare is an absolute trainwreck and I would love to see it repealed, and Hillary has done actual damage to our national security via her insecure email servers and thinks that open borders are perfectly peachy, I find your hand-wringing over Trump rather comical.

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
Considering increasing abortion restrictions, and many clinics being forced to close down - I volunteer at the only one left in my state, by the way - yes, it makes a HUGE deal if Trump's appointed justice is anti-choice.

And there is no logical way that Hillary keeping private e-mails is any way on par with Trump's willingness to use nukes and his complete lack of knowledge (or rationality) with foreign/defense policy, when you're talking about national security. Like there is no way you could actually think that. Seriously?

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
Right, because top-secret documents in an easily-hackable insecure private server doesn't hurt our national security in any way. If she is that clueless, then she is unfit for office. Fear-mongers said that Reagan would get us into a nuclear war too. Trump might at least protect Americans overseas. Hillary will just go "What difference does it make?"

As for "regulating abortion," well, if the places that perform them can't conform to basic cleanliness and hospital-access regulations, then they shouldn't exist, because having an abortion in filthy conditions in a clinic where the abortionist can't call on his local hospital if something goes horribly wrong (as it sometimes does) is the opposite of "protecting women's health."

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
Cool, you prefer nuclear winter to dubious email practices and center-right politics. I hope that you develop an allergy to corn and soy and that you have a record year for tornadoes that hit your house specifically and leave everyone else alone.

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
That's a bit much, buddy

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
No, I prefer low taxes, low regulation, and the Constitution. Since I'm not going to get any of these with either of these candidates, I prefer the one who might do the least damage to my country.

I don't live in a place that gets many tornadoes (too many mountains), but your concern for my neighbors is duly noted. Also, you would probably consider me far-right, so the idea that life-long Democrat Trump is anywhere near the center is making me laugh.

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
Jesus, no wonder you support Trump -- your reading comprehension is terrible. Hillary is center. Always has been, always will be. She's a fiscally moderate hawk with nominally socially liberal viewpoints when it comes to education and healthcare. Granted, anyone who self-identifies as far right probably hasn't acquainted themselves with an actual fact in decades, so it's an understandable mistake. There's probably a holiday weekend sale on ammo and white sheets that you need to get back to.

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
Yep. And the cries of "racist" start. BINGO.

Stocking up on ammo is a good idea, though. Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn sometimes.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: US Politics / Presidential Debate Thread

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-10-10 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Trump is actually fairly centrist overall, he's just an asshole taking advantage of far-right ideals. Which, whether YOU personally fit them or not, do in fact include things like racism.