case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-10-09 03:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #3567 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3567 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 72 secrets from Secret Submission Post #510.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Animals in media pet-peeves

(Anonymous) 2016-10-09 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Right there with you on all those bafflingly male worker bees and stuff. And in so many of them, it would barely make any difference if they made the characters female (except to the shoed-in romance, maybe).

Re: Animals in media pet-peeves

(Anonymous) 2016-10-09 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
But anon, don't you know audiences would be deeply offended by lesbian bees? Can't have that.

Re: Animals in media pet-peeves

(Anonymous) 2016-10-10 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
*Bangs fist on table*
LESBIAN BEES! LESBIAN BEES!
LES-BEE-ANS!