case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-10-10 05:56 pm

[ SECRET POST #3568 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3568 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Leslie Jones in Ghostbusters]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Conviction]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Star Trek: The Next Generation, "The Most Toys", S03E22]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Black Butler/Kuroshitsuji]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Pitch (TV Series)]


__________________________________________________



07.
[It's Difficult to Love an Otaku]


__________________________________________________



08.
(Spongebob Squarepants)


__________________________________________________



09.
[Professor Layton and the Azran Legacy, "Nut Roller" Mini-game]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Assassin's Creed 3, Connor and Haytham Kenway]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Arrow, Felicity Smoak]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Daredevil]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 60 secrets from Secret Submission Post #510.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2016-10-11 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
Mostly to cut out the T from the rest of the LGB movement. Lot of resistance to dropping the T outright, but new acronyms that just so happen to avoid it? Perfect for the Homosexual transphobes and TERFs.

Re: NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2016-10-11 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
That's probably some people's motivation, but I'm not sure that's necessarily the main motivation. And I think there's an obvious value for having a term that can refer to the totality of women loving women, without needing to get into the specifics of identifying as gay, bisexual, pansexual, etc. That's mainly been the motivation of people I've seen using it.

Re: NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2016-10-11 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
A trans guy could be a man who loves men though? Same with trans women. Not to mention most blogs that label themselves as for wlw make a point of being inclusive to trans women who are attracted to women. I feel like you are reaching here.

Re: NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2016-10-11 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, most of them seem to make a big deal about being trans inclusive, hating TERFs, and not wanting guys who won't date trans guys or girls who won't date trans girls on their blogs.
chardmonster: (Default)

Yeah this

[personal profile] chardmonster 2016-10-11 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean if anything they're TOO inclusive of transwomen. I mean think about it: they make a special note at the end of every post to say AND THIS GOES DOUBLY FOR TRANSGIRLS I mean as if someone wouldn't feel different enough you've got your supposed supporters mentioning your trans status at every possible opportunity. They don't just get to be women apparently.