[ SECRET POST #3575 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3575 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #511.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

how did you bend yourself over backwards to get that out of this.

"this picture is not shippy, don't tag it with your ship!!!! /reblogs something pointedly not-shippy with commentary about their own ship" is the behavior previous anon was talking about.

you are trying real hard to be offended

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

So you're saying that previous anon deliberately went off topic to rant about people being hypocritical about tagging fanart instead of talking about kinks like everyone else in the entire thread? Sounds like a stretch.

Either that, or you think previous anon's a fucking dumbass who hijacks threads randomly so they can complain about fanart tags. That's kind of harsh on your part, don't you think?

Re: Rant

[diet_poison]

NAYRT

So you're saying that previous anon deliberately went off topic to rant about people being hypocritical about tagging fanart

Dude, going off-topic in thread happens literally all the time, so yes, I think that's what happened.

You are reaching really, really hard here.

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

Yikes. That's what I thought at first, but you are literally never right about this stuff. Maybe next time original anon should just double-check for "unfortunate implications" before they hit 'Post.'

Re: Rant

[diet_poison]

I'm not even sure what to make of this comment. What stuff? Assertions made by anons about other anons' intentions? How would anyone know if I'm "literally [never]" right, unless one person is literally every single anon I've ever made such an assertion about?

Re: Rant

[(Anonymous)]

Anything that involves other people's emotions and anything involving more than the shallowest level of reading comprehension is just not in your wheelhouse. If it's not offensive to you, specifically, then it couldn't possibly be offensive to anyone. It's probably not your fault, and your empathy deficiency doesn't keep you from being a lovely person most of the time. But it does make your judgement pretty unreliable when it comes to whether or not someone has said or done something hurtful to anyone other than you.

Re: Rant

[diet_poison]

I can't tell if you're trolling or not and probably shouldn't respond, but do you have examples? Like is this a pattern you have been noticing of me specifically or are you mad about a particular thread?