case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-10-21 06:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #3579 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3579 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________












02. [SPOILERS for Brooklyn 99]



__________________________________________________



03. [SPOILERS for Babylon 5]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Luke Cage]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Luke Cage]



__________________________________________________









06. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for non-con/rape]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for abuse, sexual abuse]

[DWRP/Fandomwank]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #511.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-10-21 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
There is no argument for religion which does not apply just as equally to slavery.

this doesn't seem quite right

for instance, it seems to me that slavery basically contravenes the idea of the autonomy of the human person, whereas religion does not

(Anonymous) 2016-10-21 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Religions instruct to convert the unbelievers and punish those which won't be converted. Autonomy contravened right there.

(Anonymous) 2016-10-21 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you think that all religious people attempt to punish unbelievers who don't want to convert? Because it seems quite clear to me that they don't. And I'm not sure it's useful to insist on some sort of abstract, Platonic Nature of Religion that's distinct from religion as an actually-existing social phenomenon. In fact, it seems to me that the only thing that matters in this context - which is not about whether or not you or I might believe in the specific claims of religion, but about how we should approach religion in the world - is religion as a social phenomenon.

(Anonymous) 2016-10-22 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, this is hilarious. Did you learn all your religious facts from tv shows?

(Anonymous) 2016-10-22 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Some don't, but you don't seem very well informed on religions in general so I doubt we will get very far here
dancinbutterfly: (Default)

This statement is incorrect. Like, actually factually wrong.

[personal profile] dancinbutterfly 2016-10-22 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Say what you want about what religion makes people believe about their own personal existences, but I know my religion doesnt allow a person to join unless they ask, of their own free will, despite being turned down multiple times. The process of joining involves being turned away by religious leaders strictly because proselytizing and forced conversion is not allowed.

So I'm not saying that there are not religions that do that. But I am part of a religion, an ORGANIZED religion, that is proof that you are wrong and that religion as a concept does not inherently instruct people to convert unbelievers and punish resisters as a requirement for being a religion. You are just misinformed here, buddy. You flat out don't know what makes a religion if you think that because organized religions exist that do not, proving you wrong.