Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-10-26 06:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #3584 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3584 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #512.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-10-27 04:20 am (UTC)(link)They owned all the licenses that were in Infinity, so that wasn't a problem for them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-10-27 04:30 am (UTC)(link)Like for example Disney may have rights to Marvel properties, but that doesn't mean Marvel has no say in what gets produced and what doesn't within their properties. This relates to the problem you're talking about - because companies like Marvel might request a character who isn't popular sales wise still be produced for the sake of the overall franchise, but those toys naturally wouldn't be as popular and would have trouble selling, therefor, too many toys.
Licensing, from what I know of from people who work in these fields, can often complicate things a lot. Even for a company like Disney which owns a crapton of properties they still have a lot to contend with.