case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-11-01 06:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #3590 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3590 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #513.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-11-01 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT mostly I think it's a matter of pacing. Both book six and book seven had terrible pacing. Book six was largely 'teenage life at Hogwarts while we wait for Dumbledore to get to the point' and book seven was 'the never-ending camping trip where half the interesting stuff happens off-page'.

It's hard to keep a dynamic character going when your pacing is flat as a board. I sometimes wonder how book six and seven would've turned out if she hadn't felt the need to have each book end at the end of the Hogwarts school year.
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

[personal profile] morieris 2016-11-01 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I recently reread book 7 and the only chapter I skipped was Malfoy Manor. You're right, the pacing was really poor, it was either hardcore action bunched together or slow listening, planning, or camping.