[ SECRET POST #3591 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3591 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 29 secrets from Secret Submission Post #513.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

My favorite defense is usually us not knowing FOR SURE if the historical figure had sex with someone of the same sex, because that's all there is to being gay? Like yeah they lived together and shared finances and a bed and wrote love letters to each other and wrote the other person into their will but DID SHE HAVE SEX WITH THIS WOMAN? DID SHE? DID FINGERING HAPPEN??

If its an author it is also usually used to discredit any type of queer reading of a text which bugs me even more.