Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-11-02 06:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #3591 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3591 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 29 secrets from Secret Submission Post #513.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Schadenfreude
Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 12:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 12:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 12:58 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 01:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude: CW: the "n" word.
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 01:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude: CW: the "n" word.
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 01:10 am (UTC)(link)Do you have any sources for this interpretation of civil rights history? Who do you have in mind as some examples of "people that they themselves considered niggers"?
Also, why do you think that it's impossible for there to be some change that's positive, even if it also benefits a hustler, or satisfies a mob?
Re: Schadenfreude: CW: the "n" word.
(Anonymous) - 2016-11-03 01:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Schadenfreude: CW: the "n" word.
(Anonymous) - 2016-11-03 01:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Schadenfreude: CW: the "n" word.
(Anonymous) - 2016-11-03 01:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Schadenfreude: CW: the "n" word.
(Anonymous) - 2016-11-03 01:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 12:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 04:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 12:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 12:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 12:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 12:58 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 01:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 01:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 01:02 am (UTC)(link)If you want to know what it is like to be black in America, be white in Japan. You can be a nice novelty to show off, if you know enough Japanese and are pretty/handsome enough, or a goofy clown that everyone won't mind tolerating in order to enjoy your Homer Simpson-esque blundering if you don't. Then you do something that attracts legal attention, or want something that isn't being generously given to you (or are not properly grateful), then you are in for it. Oh, big time.
Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 01:04 am (UTC)(link)I mean, at the very least, it doesn't require trying to parse specifically Japanese understandings of race, so that's something
Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 01:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
"Americans were talking over the members of a certain culture that they weren't feeling the appropriate amount of outrage"
Perfectly stated. That whole thing was interesting to watch.
Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 01:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 01:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 03:26 am (UTC)(link)/an Asian person living in Asia who is going to see DS this veeeeery night
Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 12:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Schadenfreude
(Anonymous) 2016-11-03 05:01 pm (UTC)(link)As a side note, I was on holiday in Bhutan just this summer! No movie theater, but you certainly don't miss it while there, dang. Alas, lacking cosmic foresight, I neglected to ask anyone there to share their opinions on Doctor Strange casting.