case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-12-13 06:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #3632 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3632 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #519.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 12:53 pm (UTC)(link)
"They were pointing out that you're being an idiot by wanting to stick your head in the sand about learning about your favorite story just because you don't like it."

How was she "sticking her head in the sand?" Where did she say she didn't like the information about the original book?

"You don't have to like aspects of the story you like but they are still there. It's not 'critique'."

She never said she liked or didn't like the stuff that person posted.

Literally all she said was the she hadn't read the original book, and that she didn't need the person to critique HER TASTE. They were acting like she was stupid because her impression of the character was based on the play and not the original book, and well, she hadn't read the book so what do you expect?

I mean, when someone posts something, and you post a response that's only tangentially related (it pretty much all came from the fact that she called the character cool and fun), and you do it in a really condescending way, and they don't immediately drop the original subject and start talking about how interesting the stuff you brought up is, that's "sticking your head in the sand" and "not wanting to learn?"

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
This is just sad and embarrassing now.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
It's embarrassing that somebody is annoyed that people keep acting like she said something she didn't say (the stuff about not wanting to learn the origins of the story, not the stuff about the casting)?

Look, I get that people don't like Crossy-Woad, but don't keep twisting her words and acting like she said things she didn't say.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
She did say Fuck yourself asshole because she can't keep a fannish discussion civil, though. She had a worse one deleted. Classy