case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-12-13 06:36 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #3632 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3632 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #519.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 12:54 pm (UTC)(link)
"Never mind that Peter's not there to be crushed on"

Most characters aren't, and yet, people crush on them all the time. Is someone wrong to have a crush on a character just because the story has a somewhat dark origin?

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Nope, but it's super entitled to throw a homophobic little hissy fit over the casting because of it.

(Anonymous) 2020-02-14 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
... is being disappointed that a character doesn't look the way you imagined them really "homophobic" though?

I rarely get crushes on characters, but I've definitely felt disapponted when going into a movie adaptation of a book and seeing a character played in a way that is totally different from how I imagined them. Yeah, I know they aren't required to fit anyone's image (especially since everyone will have a different image in their own mind), but the feeling is pretty natural and not in itself entitled.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
No, but that doesn't make the casting "shitty" or "disturbing."

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
It's unnatural.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
No, it's not.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
It's practically pedophilia. Crossy Woad said so.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-15 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
Well, obviously a pissy, entitled internet whiner is the ultimate authority on that.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only