case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-12-13 06:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #3632 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3632 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #519.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Where, exactly, did the anon critique her taste? Oferring a conter-interpretation isn't critiquing someone's taste and, in any event, a critique is different from a personal criticism. If she wants to be agreed with all the time she should try talking to herself in the mirror rather than participating in a lively and sometimes combative discussion forum.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-14 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
True, they didn't critique her taste, so she probably shouldn't have said that. Still, I was annoyed with all the people acting like she had argued that the stuff about the origins of Peter Pan wasn't true, or insisted she didn't want to know about it when she hadn't really said anything like that at all.

I guess people were just talking past each other all around.