[ SECRET POST #3635 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3635 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________








06. [SPOILERS for Westworld]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Westworld]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Pokemon Sun and Moon]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Supernatural]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #519.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't see what that has - in the slightest - to do with what i said

[(Anonymous)]

But they'll still be wrong

You really don't see how condescending that sounds? Really?

[(Anonymous)]

I said that, if they shipped something abusive, and they thought it wasn't abusive, they'd be wrong about it not being abusive. Disagreeing about whether or not something is abusive isn't really what I'm driving at here.

like, I think what I'm trying to get across is that this tends to get framed in terms of whether or not it's OK to ship something abusive. and I'm not sure that makes sense, because they're kind of different things. Ship whatever you want, but whether or not the relationship doesn't actually have anything to do with shipping it or not shipping it. Saying "you should be able to ship whatever you want" doesn't actually relate to the question of whether relationships in fictional works are depicted as absuive.