case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-12-29 05:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3648 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3648 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #521.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-29 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I do not agree with your assertion that posting an innocuous, non-wank stirring secret means you're welcoming other peoples' lack of civility in responses, i.e. "asking for it".

(Anonymous) 2016-12-29 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
So, my original comment - each to their own [...] but that's pretty boring hair - was sufficiently uncivil, by your standards, for you to start dogwhistling rape culture?

Wow. Just, wow.
Fuck you, mate. Fuck this, fuck you, I'm out. I was willing to have this conversation when I thought you were just a pearl-clutching wowser, but it seems that you are, instead, a complete fucking wankhandle. Fuck off.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-29 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

Can I tell you that 'complete fucking wankhandle' will be the next insult I use when I am annoyed with someone at work, thank you.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-29 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
If it offends you, then feel free to leave off the last bit. I still stand by this, however: "I do not agree with your assertion that posting an innocuous, non-wank stirring secret means you're welcoming other peoples' lack of civility in responses."

But your above comment and subsequent name-calling doesn't really help your argument that you're not being impolite or uncivil.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-29 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
But, no-one's even mentioned Hitler yet?

nayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-12-30 03:38 am (UTC)(link)
He's in a different thread.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-30 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Are you into hair porn or something? Get over yourself, lmao.