Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-01-10 06:28 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #3660 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3660 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #523.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-11 12:00 am (UTC)(link)Also, that makes it even worse for muggle to be accepted if it is somehow a slur.
Americans, doing shit better than the Brits even in the world of magic!
no subject
British informal
a stupid or gullible person.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-11 03:45 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-11 07:12 am (UTC)(link)OHHHHHH
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-11 12:48 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-11 06:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
That construction is why it's nonsensical. Nobody talked like that in English in the 15th century. That sort of construction is very 20th Century American Military.
'Muggle''s an odd word, but I can get to it from a plain descriptive word with a pretty simple chain - Magicless -> Magi'less -> Magless -> Məgless -> Mugless -> Muggles -> Muggle. A bit of lazy pronunciation, some loose spelling, and a backformation, and we're there. You could get there from the same start point with different chains, too, of course.
I have no idea if Rowling's ever thought about the etymology (probably not), but it's actually surprisingly easy to come up with a reasonable one.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-11 12:26 am (UTC)(link)And yeah...muggle is still super nonsensical compared to "Smoosh two words together."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-11 02:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-11 03:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-11 07:22 am (UTC)(link)I wouldn't be surprised if it managed to make its way into the book as the name of a creature that no maj's took to use the effect that the creature's presence provoked. They had heard it everywhere when there was a population boom of meemies around 1940-1944.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-01-11 03:24 am (UTC)(link)