case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-01-12 07:08 pm

[ SECRET POST #3662 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3662 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #523.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
I have no evidence that any of them are, and I'm sure they're not, but I feel like every single one of today's secrets has the vibe of a repeat from like 5 years ago
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

[personal profile] morieris 2017-01-13 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
Because someone is talking about supernatural?

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
I really hope someone majorly involved in that show is outed as a pedophile or something like that. I really do. It is probably the only way to get people to shut up about it.

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
Supernatural has enough pedophilia connections already choose a different scandal

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Tell me more?
soldatsasha: (Default)

[personal profile] soldatsasha 2017-01-13 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
I too would love more deets if only bc I thrive on anti-SPN stuff. The only 'pedo connection' I know about SPN is the kink meme was fucking horrifying (pedo shit and dog fucking everywhere, not A/B/O, literal dog fucking). But that's really nothing to do with the show itself, just creepy fans.
ibbity: (Default)

[personal profile] ibbity 2017-01-13 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
The fandom can be horrible, and omnipresent, but I feel like wishing something that terrible on the cast/crew is hardly fair

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
Letting them off unfairly easy, but I'd take what I could get.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2017-01-13 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Wow, aren't you a fucking ray of sunshine. Enjoy thinking about kids being fucked over, do you?

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
No, just thinking about supernatards being fucked over, but since being raped is what they seem to enjoy thinking about then that is no biggie.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2017-01-13 05:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Uh, no, you're fantasizing about someone 'high up' in SPN being a 'pedophile' which naturally means, some child getting molested/abused. Which you seem to think would be great.

You are a revolting excuse for a human being and 'supernatards'? Wow. Could you be more juvenile and gross. At least your anon, eh?

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I could totally be more juvenile and gross, but then Case would kill the thread. Love how how you are trying to Anon-shame and use your name account as a bully pulpit though.

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh please, "bully pulpit?" It's tabaqui. She's like a less edgy otakugal. No one takes her seriously.

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Not that they're talking about Supernatural, as such, but the fact that none of them references any particular recent fandom or event, plus their general vibe in terms of content and visual appearance, just gives me that impression

[personal profile] philippos42 2017-01-13 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
I see what you mean, but isn't the Superman Funko recent?

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
Is it? I had no idea!

[personal profile] philippos42 2017-01-13 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know, I just assumed it was.

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
Wrll, make us some fresh, new secrets for next week then.

(Anonymous) 2017-01-13 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
I wasn't complaining! Sorry if that came out wrong. Just remarking. It's a very vintage, retro vibe.