[ SECRET POST #3666 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3666 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #524.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Well.

[(Anonymous)]

Adding a diminutive onto an already short name to indicate closeness is different from a pointless shortening, though?

Re: Well.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

If you think shortening an already short name for a nickname is pointless, then lengthening a short name should be worse. A nickname can be made for a name of any number of syllables and it doesn't have to make any logical sense, though many nicknames are shorter or easier to call out. And, yes, sometimes people don't have nicknames, but that doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the length of their name. Someone who calls me by my nickname is generally closer to me than someone who calls me by my given name.