case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-02-03 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3684 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3684 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________

















02. [SPOILERS for Sherlock S4]



__________________________________________________



03. [SPOILERS for Voltron: Legendary Defender Season 2]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Series of Unfortunate Events]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Jungle Book 2016]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for incest]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for abuse]

(Breaking Bad)













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #526.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (warning for suicide) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-02-04 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
I think people who think a secret might be a repeat but don't know for sure (and aren't willing to go through past posts to verify it) should refrain from calling out the secret if it's only based on their feels.

(Anonymous) 2017-02-04 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
I posted in case it looks familiar to other people and not just me. I assume that's why anybody ever does it.

(Anonymous) 2017-02-04 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
Okay. But since pointing out a possible repeat can get someone's secret failbarred, I don't think it's fair to do so based on vague, unconfirmed "this looks familiar" concerns. Verify it's a repeat, or maybe just leave it be?

(Anonymous) 2017-02-04 02:13 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

One of my pet peeves, tbh.