case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-02-06 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #3687 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3687 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Viewfinder]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Final Fantasy VII]



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #527.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-02-07 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
I think she is one of the Richard III is innocent crowd, that someone else did it to curry favor with him without his knowledge and he covered it up rather than execute them for it even though the latter course would have done more to bolster his claims of being the legitimate king. It is about as plausible as the Blackadder explanation for them, really.

(Anonymous) 2017-02-07 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
To be fair, that's one of the more credible theories - more so than trying to lay the blame on Henry VII. But personally, I think it's highly unlikely Richard III was not involved on some level.

(Anonymous) 2017-02-07 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sticking with the Richard III had them murdered theory. Maybe out of the idea that in his tumultuous times a child king was a bad idea, maybe because he thought they were illegitimate, maybe because he just did a musical sequence with a bunch of Hyenas, who knows, but the time line of him taking them into care, declaring them illegitimate, declaring himself the only legitimate heir, and nobody ever seeing or hearing about them again, seems to line up with the murder by Richard theory.

(Anonymous) 2017-02-07 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
I agree.

(Anonymous) 2017-02-07 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
Don't expect sanity or rational thinking from the Richard III is innocent crowd, that's my motto!

(Anonymous) 2017-02-07 11:23 am (UTC)(link)
I don't understand why they get so worked up about it. Even with the murder of the princes in the tower, he still isn't even close to being in the top ten worst English Monarchs.