case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-02-15 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #3696 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3696 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
(Jimmy McGill/Saul Goodman BCS/Breaking Bad, Rich Sanchez Rick and Morty)


__________________________________________________



03.
[Carrie Fisher with Irish comedian Aisling Bea, 8 out of 10 Cats]


__________________________________________________



04.
(Casey Neistat)


__________________________________________________



05.
[Yuri on Ice]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Digimon]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Criminal Minds, Dr. Spencer Reid]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #528.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Inspired by #7

(Anonymous) 2017-02-16 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
I mean, if I have a high familiarity with a particular topic - due to, say, my academic work and professional experiences - sure, it can throw me out. But I am usually pretty good about just going with the rules of a particular universe, and even if that universe is supposed to be the real universe, I figure all fiction needs to operate by its own rules. My only issue would be, when by the rules of that universe the plot seems to contradict itself.

So I have a history master's and I could absolutely go through historical dramas and point out all the inaccuracies, they don't bother me as much as they should. As long as it's consistent. On the other hand, something being conveniently hand-waived for plot purposes frustrates me.

Also, warrior women in skimpy armor with pencil-thin arms and high heels. That throws me out a little.