[ SECRET POST #3698 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3698 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Voltron: Legendary Defender]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sherlock]


__________________________________________________


















05. [WARNING for gore]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for incest]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for pedophilia, rape, child abuse, etc.]

[Lolita]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #528.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

SPOILERS

[dancing_serpent]

Sure, no problem. Spoilers ahead in case you might still be interested at least a little bit:



I love the episode for the fantastic dynamics and interactions - the drugging thing was really interesting to me, especially as at that point all of them had already been drugged by someone else and weren't thinking clearly any more. I fully believe Sherlock would have tried that experiment anyway, though.

Sherlock actually doubting himself for once, and John taking charge and pulling rank were some of my highlights, and they managed to build a nice tense atmosphere with the landscape and the eerie fox screams.

Re: SPOILERS

[(Anonymous)]

See, part of the problem I have with Sherlock is that even when it's on form, it seems to focus on pulling up the absolute worst elements of the original stories and magnifying them, and that's just really not as interesting to me as it might be to someone else?

Re: SPOILERS

[dancing_serpent]

Yeah, I can see that. Maybe I would have less fun with the show if I had read ACD canon, or had more contact with Sherlock Holmes than just watching the Guy Ritchie movies.

It's thistlechild who collects/reads/watches anything Holmes, and I basically just listened to her commentary while we were watching, pointing out the things that were loosely adapted from the books.

Re: SPOILERS

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah. It's possible that I would have enjoyed Sherlock more if it'd been an original show with original characters as well, but my dad read the Holmes stories to me as bedtime stories as a kid (yes, murders and all, in hindsight that may be responsible for a lot), so the fact that the show is theoretically a Holmes adaptation does have a lot of impact on my enjoyment.

Re: SPOILERS

[dancing_serpent]

*snickers* My dad is a science and science fiction guy, so I got introduced to Dune very early. Murders, politics and religion - so I can totally relate to Holmes as bedtime stories. My mother went for classic Russian authors, which wasn't any better.

Yeah, for me, Sherlock basically is an original show with characters that happen to have familiar names. Maybe that also explains why my favourite relationships are Sherlock and Mycroft, or Sherlock and Lestrade, and Sherlock and John only to a lesser degree.