case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-02-21 06:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #3702 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3702 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #529.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-02-22 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
I think QT is more judicious and sparing in his use of violence. It's also more stylized - which is the opposite of realistic.

I don't watch horror/slasher movies.
ninety6tears: lydia looking away (tw: lydia)

[personal profile] ninety6tears 2017-02-22 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
The problem with this argument is that there's no consensus on whether realistic and graphic violence is more respectful to the reality of violence than the decision to stylize it more. And I think it's very subjective between different viewers.

It's interesting that George Miller has taken varying approaches to it (though I guess he's never been that graphic). Mad Max began as partly inspired by his experiences seeing a lot of injuries from violent gang activity while he was an emergency room doctor, so it's not something he takes lightly.
Edited 2017-02-22 00:46 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2017-02-22 06:30 am (UTC)(link)
So really it's just that you think it's icky. Which is a question of taste and not objectie quality or morality.