[ SECRET POST #3702 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3702 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #529.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah I mean I don't think we're going to sort this one out, it's a pretty central and deep philosophical question. Like I said, deep and dangerous waters.

I guess for practical purposes I can rephrase my initial point as: there might be some limitations and issues with considering religions from a purely theological point of view.

[ketita]

I can get behind that. It's not that I'm saying that there can never be any political element to religion, but I do think it can be useful to differentiate between theological and political and elements that are a mixture of both within a religion.
For example, Religion A saying "all members of Religion B are evil hellspawn born of the Destroyer" may have political roots, but it's being couched in theological concepts, so I'd lean towards theology for that specific issue.
Then again, the question comes down to what exactly we're trying to define and discuss etc. in each situation.