ext_25570 ([identity profile] ariseishirou.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets 2008-05-13 09:57 pm (UTC)

07. I'm not sure that was the message we were supposed to take from that.

16. Agreed. His personality does a 180 for the sake of the romantic subplot, and while I've seen this happen to teenagers in love before, it never lasts. Squall/Rinoa is undeniably canon... for a couple of weeks, before both 17-year-olds realize that he isn't a knight in shining armor but rather an antisocial ass/she isn't a pretty princess in need of saving, but rather a very strong-willed but also very immature young socialite.

17. Nah, I'm the same way. I've always identified more with male characters and I have no gender issues. I blame it on the portayal of female characters in the media - i.e., if there were more female characters I could relate to, I would.

20. I don't think you're overthinking it. It is misogynist. And there are plenty of other ways they could get off.

This from the person who wondered the whole time what would get one to lose their ears while reading Loveless. Is oral enough? Does it have to be penetrative? If so, most straight guys would have their cat ears for life.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting