Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-03-09 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #3718 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3718 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Criminal Minds, Stephen Walker]
__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

[Death in Paradise, Humphrey/Florence]
__________________________________________________
05.

[The NeverEnding Story]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Beyoncé]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #531.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-10 12:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-10 12:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-10 01:21 am (UTC)(link)'s weird
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-10 02:13 am (UTC)(link)Plus, Guy Fieri officiated 101 gay marriages in Florida, as a tribute to his late sister, so if he is homophobic, he's hiding it very well.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/02/24/guy-fieri-gay-weddings-miami/23959839/
http://www.afterellen.com/tv/417129-guy-fieri-speaks-late-gay-sister-marrying-sex-couples-florida
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-10 11:22 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-10 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)As far as I can tell, he isn't gay? Which wouldn't make it 'internalized homophobia'?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-10 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/internalize
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-11 01:06 am (UTC)(link)No, but it is what "internalized homophobia" means. If he's homophobic, he'd just be... Homophobic.
Again, the claims re: his so called behavior have never been substantiated by anyone without an ax to grind (the one person who claimed to have seen it is/was being paid by the person with an ax to grind, can you see the conflict of interest, when it's never been given weight by anyone else that worked with him?)