[ SECRET POST #3718 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3718 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Criminal Minds, Stephen Walker]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Death in Paradise, Humphrey/Florence]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The NeverEnding Story]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Beyoncé]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #531.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Book club - April poll

[(Anonymous)]

Strategic voting isn't my main point - it doesn't bother me that much, anyway. I was responding to anon's argument about strategic voting. My point is that I think being able to vote for as many things as you want, instead of worrying about what the most likely winner is, would be better. If everyone else disagrees of course I accept that.

Re: Book club - April poll

[(Anonymous)]

OK, I think I understand a little better now.

However, I don't really see how that would change the result in any significant way. I mean, if we had the rule that we would read the books in second, third etc. place later, then it would make more sense. But as it is, Nightwatch would still be in the lead and the most likely winner. The number of votes for every book might be higher, but I don't think the proportion would change.

Or rather, what would you hope to gain by changing the way the poll works?