Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-03-27 06:21 pm
[ SECRET POST #3736 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3736 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Star Trek: AOS (Reboot)]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Jake Lloyd, Star Wars]
__________________________________________________
04.

(A Little Princess, the 1995 Alfonso Cuarón version)
__________________________________________________
05.

[Detective Constable Katie Harford (played by Georgina Campbell) on Broadchurch (season 3)]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Naruto, KakaSasu]
__________________________________________________
07. [repeat]
[The Nosleep Podcast]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #533.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(A Little Princess, the 1995 Alfonso Cuarón version)
no subject
Now I want to reread the book again.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-29 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-27 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)I don't really like the movie or the book, but that part wasn't a plothole.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-27 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)Even in WWII (vs. WWI era where the movie was set), evacuating children from dangerous places usually meant from English cities to the English countryside, not overseas and certainly not to the U.S. - for the exact same reasons why this was not a practical solution in WWI.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-27 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-03-28 00:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-03-28 03:42 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-27 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)With that said, child evacuation as a concept wasn't really a thing in WWI, and Captain Crewe joined up at the start of it when people were still mostly optimistic that it was going to be over quickly and fairly painlessly. Setting the movie in NYC was just silly.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-27 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)In other words, yeah, it was kind of a plot hole.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-28 07:17 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-27 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)I read the book before I ever saw the movie and I remember being a little annoyed with the changes, but I really liked it. I liked it way more than the Shirley Temple version and I used to be obsessed with her when I was a kid. As an adult, I can view it with a more critical eye, but I still enjoy it and it's one of the movies I watch when I'm sick or just need to have a restful day. I find it soothing, especially the soundtrack.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-27 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)(Confession, I've never actually read the book.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-28 01:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-28 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Plus i hated all that damn *green* everywhere.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-28 12:10 am (UTC)(link)I didn't mind what they did with Sara's character, I was actually happy about her dad being okay, I LOVED Becky (I was ambivalent to her in the book), and as you said, stunning visuals. I will admit the "all girls are princesses" thing was a bit hamfisted, though.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-28 01:48 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-03-28 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject