[ SECRET POST #3736 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3736 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Star Trek: AOS (Reboot)]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Jake Lloyd, Star Wars]


__________________________________________________



04.
(A Little Princess, the 1995 Alfonso Cuarón version)


__________________________________________________



05.
[Detective Constable Katie Harford (played by Georgina Campbell) on Broadchurch (season 3)]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Naruto, KakaSasu]


__________________________________________________



07. [repeat]
[The Nosleep Podcast]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #533.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I would agree except for the fact that I don't think her pose is any LESS provocative or 'sexy' than Danny's spread legs or the emphasis on Luke's chest.

I mean, she's not standing in a way that forces her butt out or anything, she's literally just in the middle of something and turned towards the camera.

[(Anonymous)]

Her pose is DEFINITELY more provocative and sexualized than Luke's.

The Danny example is less clear-cut but given the context (he is spreading his legs because he's in a martial-arts-y crouch) I would argue that Jessica is still more unnecessarily sexualized. Like, sure, yes, she's just turning around to face the camera, but it's still hard to deny that the pose is one that allows us to look at her ass, and it seems hard to think of why else she'd in that pose.

[(Anonymous)]

Sorry, disagree. You'll note that Luke's shirt isn't skin tight, and Jessica's jeans are, for starters. I also think that Danny's pose is more about showing how he's all exotic and martial artsy rather than sexual.

[(Anonymous)]

If you read every woman in moderately tight pants as a sexualised image, you're going to have a hard time.

It's meant to be her spray-painting "DEFENDERS" on the wall. It's not very convincing, but that's what it is.