case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-04-01 04:25 pm

[ SECRET POST #3741 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3741 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 67 secrets from Secret Submission Post #534.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-02 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
like

that

is

supposed

to

mean

shit

.

(Anonymous) 2017-04-02 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
What I mean is, you are equating jokes about someones name to jokes about sexuality and weight. Think about that equation - do you think it is a correct viewpoint?

(Anonymous) 2017-04-02 08:43 am (UTC)(link)
Uh, yes?

(Anonymous) 2017-04-02 03:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I respect you for your consistency, but I also think that this is a very dumb position and that you are extremely wrong

Like, just on a basic level, sexuality and weight are things that are on axes of oppression in a way that names aren't (especially in the case of Cumberbatch, where his name is - if anything - a marker of historical privilege - it's not like we're talking about someone from a non-Western immigrant culture who's being marked out as an other). Ergo, it is not a good comparison.