Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-04-08 03:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #3748 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3748 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 50 secrets from Secret Submission Post #536.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(If you think something in this thread is a troll, please ignore it! Conversation is fine, but OT wank makes stuff harder to keep track of in this thread. Thanks.)
(frozen comment) Please nuke the shit out of this thread
As someone who is ACTUALLY disabled this is incredibly insulting. I think it's time Wako was sent on his way, because this is too far, even for him.
(frozen comment) Re: Please nuke the shit out of this thread
Also, send me on my way? How?
(frozen comment) Re: Please nuke the shit out of this thread
(frozen comment) Re: Please nuke the shit out of this thread
(frozen comment) Re: Please nuke the shit out of this thread
Can you delete so I can resubmit iwth proper title?
(Anonymous) 2017-04-08 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-04-08 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/1594592.html?thread=955235552#cmt955235552
counter-proposal: ban dethtoll
(Anonymous) 2017-04-09 12:31 am (UTC)(link)force him to make good on his thread to LEAVE F!S FOREVER
Re: counter-proposal: ban dethtoll
(Anonymous) 2017-04-09 01:03 am (UTC)(link)Re: counter-proposal: ban dethtoll
Check!
Re: counter-proposal: ban dethtoll
(Anonymous) 2017-04-09 02:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: counter-proposal: ban dethtoll
also "well you don't speak for disabled people" is often used when disabled people speak their opinion on things and it's really awful because it dismisses and brushes off disabled people speaking up.
Re: counter-proposal: ban dethtoll
For the record I don't think either of us should be banned, but the while thing of "I have X credential, therefore SILENCE" is a nuclear warhead on a discussion based community like this.
Re: counter-proposal: ban dethtoll
Also, I wouldn't say I feel bullied. He has no specific power over me, so I figure let me say my price and him say his.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-04-09 02:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I ask because I'm not sure whether people are also objecting to comments like "I'm enjoying blind Soldier 76 headcanons in the Overwatch fandom. Mostly because you get great scenes in fics where he loses his visor in battle." (Nobody is replying to those so I'm not sure if that's included, but it seems innocuous enough.)
Either way, in the future, discussion of disabilities and stuff are definitely going under the "content warnings required for threads" category.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-04-09 04:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Maybe I don't get it, I'll freely admit. I don't see where in the thread things were said that could be analogous to your example. The thread is vulgar in places, but "(real life) disabled girl fetish" or "how hard someone would fap to a real life person" isn't anywhere in that, nor in any of the responses. It's pretty clear people are talking about disability tropes in fiction or characters in scenarios.
I'd like to hear more about your specific objections if possible. Is your stance that having a kink for disability tropes in fiction is offensive and/or wrong, and should not be discussed on FS at all? Or is your stance that the discussion is disrespectful and offensive in tone by referring to those tropes as "sexiest disabilities"? Or something else?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2017-04-09 17:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-04-09 05:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-04-09 05:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
"I'm enjoying blind Soldier 76 headcanons in the Overwatch fandom. Mostly because you get great scenes in fics where he loses his visor in battle."
count as dehumanization? I ask since replies along those lines are the bulk of the responses to the thread.
Do you find the main post there offensive because of its tone, content, or both? Do you find the responses there offensive because of their tone, content, or both? I see a clear distinction between the "sexy disabilities" post and the responses which are about disabled characters, but I'm not sure if you're suggesting banning one or both.
no subject
And that would be unacceptable to you?
Do you intent to apply the same standard to yaoi fans?
Discussions of slash? Where the fujioshis are getting excited by the site sexy guys?
Any of the threads talking about the guys of the MCU?
Where is the line on what is acceptable?
Or is the line just "as soon as someone objects it stops"
Proposal
(Anonymous) 2017-04-09 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)It would make things easier.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-04-09 05:29 pm (UTC)(link)