[ SECRET POST #3748 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3748 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 50 secrets from Secret Submission Post #536.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Sexiest disabilities in fiction

[(Anonymous)]

DA

I'm not sure where the line is for the other people on this thread, but for me the line is between fetishizing the body part apart from the person they are a part of vs. seeing the person as a whole person? Which I'm not sure would be an issue with any of those other kinks. But, like, someone getting off on a bunch of missing limbs without the person actually missing them bothers me because even though it is a fictional character, it is still supposed to be a person, a whole person, not just parts there for wank material.


But the way Wako was talking about Barbara before makes me think they aren't fetishizing her legs in the way that would make me uncomfortable. So I'm not sure what it is that others are having a problem with because I don't see what makes me personally uncomfortable here.

Re: Sexiest disabilities in fiction

[thewakokid]

I have been known to fetishize body parts too, tho.

Ever read "everyday life with monster girls" I thoughtt the scene with Zombinas disembodied boob was pretty hot...

Thats just me being nitpicky, tho. I appreciate what your saying.