[ SECRET POST #3755 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3755 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [tb]


__________________________________________________



08.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 50 secrets from Secret Submission Post #536.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

What about a band who's been around for over 20 years, but has just released a new album. Do the new songs get grandfathered in as "classic rock"?

[(Anonymous)]

They get played for 3 months or so, and then they go away, because no band has ever released a genuinely good album after having been around for 20 years.

Prove me wrong.

[(Anonymous)]

Elvis Costello. He has jumped genres a time or three, but his music is consistently interesting and innovative.

[(Anonymous)]

I haven't listened to his later stuff - which post-1997 album of his would you actively choose to put on, or play on the radio, or whatever? Or to put it another way, what's the album that you would feel comfortable actively putting into your rotation?

[(Anonymous)]

I play Secrets Profane and Sugarcane all the time. Almost as often as My Aim is True.

[(Anonymous)]

fair enough! I'll give it a listen

[(Anonymous)]

Rush. Fuck you.

[(Anonymous)]

Well, I don't think any of their albums are good so i'm not a qualified judge

(also I'm not trying to prove anyone is wrong if they do like an album like that, I'd love to be proven wrong, just chatting about music)

[(Anonymous)]

Radiohead.

[badbastion]

Agreed.

Aerosmith

[(Anonymous)]

They've had music I've liked in the 70s, the 80s, the 90s, and 00s.

I would say the Rolling Stones, but I only like a few of their songs and most of them are from before the 80s, so.

Re: Aerosmith

[(Anonymous)]

WRT the Rolling Stones, I think even the most optimistic, positive Stones fan would acknowledge that they haven't released a genuinely good album since Tattoo You in 1981. I personally would go back further to It's Only Rock n Roll which was 1974. And their first album was in 1964, so they miss the 20 year mark by a good fair bit.

Can't speak to Aerosmith though.