Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2017-04-17 06:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #3757 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3757 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #536.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-17 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-17 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-17 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)Some of the discussions around the place made it seem far less nuanced than it actually is but I think a lot of people have trouble picking up nuances or interpreting things that aren't said outright. I think it might be a bit of a tough ride for the intended audience, though. When I was a teenager I would have thought of all the characters as terrible heartless evil bullies and wouldn't have picked up on a lot of that stuff.
Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-17 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)The best character in the series was the dead Dad. I think I would have rather watch a series about him.
Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-18 03:26 am (UTC)(link)Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-18 05:42 am (UTC)(link)Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-18 08:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: Rate the Thing
Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-17 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Rate the Thing
Re: Rate the Thing
Re: Rate the Thing
Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-17 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-17 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)It was one of the better episodes I've seen of late.
Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-17 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Rate the Thing
Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-18 12:08 am (UTC)(link)Read - Angels Burning by Tawni O'Dell. It's about a female police chief in a fictionalized version of Centralia, PA, who has to solve the murder of a teenage girl, while also dealing with family drama and her mom's murder decades before. It was...not good. The "mystery" was really anti-climactic and uninteresting, the family drama was boring/weird (I don't know of any real people who'd act the way these characters did), and the main character was super unlikable. In one scene she's at the hospital after a teenage boy was shot (which was her fault, because she wasn't doing her job properly) and all she can think about is how horny she is and her coworker (who she's sleeping with)'s big dick and how bad she wants to fuck him. There's also this half-feral young boy who everyone likes to joke is part monkey/squirrel who's always climbing on top of cars and climbing up the sides of houses and jumping on shit, that's clearly supposed to be comic relief, but it's just bizarre and stupid. I've read another of the author's books (Back Roads) and liked it (although I was a teenager at the time so I'm not sure if I'd like it now) but I was not a fan of this one at all. There are two more of her books that sound interesting so I might give those a shot but I'm not sure.
Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-18 12:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: Rate the Thing
Central Intelligence: exactly what I thought it would be. Some jokes I liked, some I didn't but ultimately I enjoyed it's silly self while it was on.
The Magnificent Seven: absolutely nothing like the trailers I saw, which made it look a lot more comedic than it is, but that's not a bad thing and as a western it was fine. Not my favourite genre though so I didn't love it and was okay with missing bits of it when I wanted to go to the kitchen because I didn't care enough.
I think I'd give both a solid C+, nothing amazing but enjoyable in their own right.
Re: Rate the Thing
Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-18 01:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-18 01:29 am (UTC)(link)But on the other hand, it more crass than I generally enjoy, and Bojack isn't sympathetic enough for me to really get emotionally engaged with the story. I'm someone who likes characters that are extremely flawed and struggling not to be awful people, but Bojack takes that too far for me. There's no real balance between good and bad with him; he's struggling, yes, but at the end of the day he really is a piece of shit.
Currently reading: If on a winter's night a traveler. The most gimmicky book I've ever read. If it weren't short, I'd have quit fifty pages in.
Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-18 01:43 am (UTC)(link)The lead actress (Tang Wei) was fantastic, but I don't really recommend it. Too long, and the plot was a little thin.
Re: Rate the Thing
(Anonymous) 2017-04-18 01:44 am (UTC)(link)oops, forgot to Rate the Thing. Lets say 7/10.
Listening (2014)
I gave it a thumbs down rating about 15 minutes in. But as we had committed, we watched the whole thing.
It was slow, it was dull, the colouring of various scenes was confusing as hell. There was no passion, the characters were so rigid and flat. It was hard to pay attention, we were not invested in anything but the movie ending. We were going to google what the hell this movie was meant to be and if it was about poor broke grad students because it was MADE by poor broke grad students because it really seemed like some over-artsy-final-video-project except boring as fuck.
I wish netflix still had star ratings. It was beyond thumbsdown, it's a 0.5 star rating.