case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2017-04-23 04:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #3763 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3763 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 49 secrets from Secret Submission Post #538.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
thewakokid: (Default)

Re: Political quiz

[personal profile] thewakokid 2017-04-24 07:59 am (UTC)(link)
I dunno. I fancy, if you were into it, I could match you lunacy for lunacy. The horseshoe theory is in full effect so I reckon for every lunatic right winger you care to name I can find their opposite number on the left.

Although thinking about it that depends on perspective. Like, if you're inclined to one side or the other you might see the same action as Atrocious or Perfectly Reasonable depending on which side was doing it. But from my view, I could pick either side and be confident in a draw.

Re: Political quiz

(Anonymous) 2017-04-24 05:32 pm (UTC)(link)
even if the magnitude of the insanity is the same, it's still going to be misleading and wrong to assume that the content and the nature of the insanity is the same

that's the whole problem with the horseshoe theory and similar things: it assumes that there's this natural law that the two things have to be equal to each other, and there just is not. and so it's misleading and causes misunderstanding, which is bad.